On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:49, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov
MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
Make pg_ctl's -s option suppress informational event logging.
This will ultimately be up to a committer (and I'm not one), but to
me it seems
From: Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
Thanks, sorry about the delay, patch applied. I backpatched it back to
8.3 which is as far as it applied cleanly - I'm not excited enough
about it to bother a manual backpatch to 8.2.
Thank you very much, Magnus. I don't mind 8.2 as = 8.3 is enough for
From: Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov
MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
Make pg_ctl's -s option suppress informational event logging.
This will ultimately be up to a committer (and I'm not one), but to
me it seems reasonable to back-patch if it is addressed this way.
the
From: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
I wish the fix will be back-patched in 8.3, too.
I guess the question is whether this is a bug which causes more
problems than the potential breakage which might ensue for
MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
I think Tom had the right idea upthread: what we should do is
make the -s option to pg_ctl suppress these messages (as it
does with similar messages on Linux). Removing them altogether
seems like overkill, for the
I'm sorry to interrupt you, but how should I treat this bug report I issued?
Should I submit a bug fix patch for the latest source code (=v9.1)? I wish
the fix will be back-patched in 8.3, too.
If yes, I would like to get a concensus on the solution. As I mentioned, I
think that it is enough
MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry to interrupt you, but how should I treat this bug report
I issued? Should I submit a bug fix patch for the latest source
code (=v9.1)?
Patches should always be submitted against the HEAD of the master
branch.
I wish the fix will be
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
I wish the fix will be back-patched in 8.3, too.
I guess the question is whether this is a bug which causes more
problems than the potential breakage which might ensue for someone
who relies on the current
