George,
* George Papadrosou (gpapadro...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Stephen, you mentioned PostGIS, but the conversation seems to lean towards
> JSONB. What are your thoughts?
Both are important. I brought up PostGIS specifically because it's an
external project which could benefit from this work and
Hello all,
thank you for your replies. I agree with Alexander Korotkov that it is
important to have a quality patch at the end of the summer.
Stephen, you mentioned PostGIS, but the conversation seems to lean towards
JSONB. What are your thoughts?
Also, if I am to include some ideas/approac
Robert Haas writes:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:03 PM, George Papadrosou
> wrote:
>> The project’s idea is implement different slicing approaches according to
>> the value’s datatype. For example a text field could be split upon character
>> boundaries while a JSON document would be split in a w
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:03 AM, George Papadrosou
wrote:
> *Deliverables *
>
> - Implement “semantic” slicing for datatypes that support slicing into
> TOAST tables. These datatypes will be the Text, Array, JSON/JSONb and XML
> data types.
>
That looks too much comprehensive GSoC project for m
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:03 PM, George Papadrosou
wrote:
> The project’s idea is implement different slicing approaches according to
> the value’s datatype. For example a text field could be split upon character
> boundaries while a JSON document would be split in a way that allows fast
> access
Hello!
Thank you for your message. I was just about to send this email when I got
yours.
> I don't recall seeing an email from you about this yet? My apologies if
> I missed it
My apologies for the inconvenience, I wish I could start earlier with this but
there was so much coursework reachin
