Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 09:32:54PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
While I'm complaining: that's got to be one of the least useful error
messages I've ever seen, and it's for a case that's surely going to be
fairly common in practice. Can't we persuade
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 09:51:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Whilst trying to reproduce bug #3902 I noticed that the code doesn't
work with an abbreviated host name:
Testing w/ 8.3RC2, everything seems to be
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 09:32:54PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
While I'm complaining: that's got to be one of the least useful error
messages I've ever seen, and it's for a case that's surely going to be
fairly common in practice. Can't we persuade GSSAPI to produce
something more
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While I'm complaining: that's got to be one of the least useful error
messages I've ever seen, and it's for a case that's surely going to be
fairly common in practice.
AFAIK, that one is for Kerberos only. For GSSAPI, we already use the
Whilst trying to reproduce bug #3902 I noticed that the code doesn't
work with an abbreviated host name:
$ psql -l -h rh2.sss.pgh.pa.us
List of databases
... everything's fine ...
$ psql -l -h rh2
psql: GSSAPI continuation error: Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Whilst trying to reproduce bug #3902 I noticed that the code doesn't
work with an abbreviated host name:
$ psql -l -h rh2.sss.pgh.pa.us
List of databases
... everything's fine ...
$ psql -l -h rh2
psql: GSSAPI
Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Whilst trying to reproduce bug #3902 I noticed that the code doesn't
work with an abbreviated host name:
Testing w/ 8.3RC2, everything seems to be working fine here:
Okay, that probably means there's something
