Re: [HACKERS] Gerbil build farm failure

2005-09-27 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 06:58:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gerbil's looking better lately: http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=gerbilbr=REL8_0_STABLE Yeah. We've been poking at it off-list, and it seems that the problem was a local

Re: [HACKERS] Gerbil build farm failure

2005-09-26 Thread Michael Fuhr
Gerbil's looking better lately: http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=gerbilbr=REL8_0_STABLE -- Michael Fuhr ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Gerbil build farm failure

2005-09-26 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gerbil's looking better lately: http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=gerbilbr=REL8_0_STABLE Yeah. We've been poking at it off-list, and it seems that the problem was a local build failure due to not having a clean copy of the repository (ye

Re: [HACKERS] Gerbil build farm failure

2005-09-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Now that we have backtrace, does anyone have a clue about the cause/fix? --- Jim C. Nasby wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 01:17:10PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: I worked with Jim Nasby and we found this is the line that

Re: [HACKERS] Gerbil build farm failure

2005-09-22 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes: Now that we have backtrace, does anyone have a clue about the cause/fix? The backtrace suggests a garbage snapshot value, but doesn't provide nearly enough info to guess where it's coming from. I'm waiting for the promised ssh access...

Re: [HACKERS] Gerbil build farm failure

2005-09-22 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:56:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Fire lit under IT dept. Their initial plan was everything outbound but SSH would be cut-off, which I nixed, but would that suffice in the short term if it means getting the box on the net

Re: [HACKERS] Gerbil build farm failure

2005-09-22 Thread Tom Lane
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Fire lit under IT dept. Their initial plan was everything outbound but SSH would be cut-off, which I nixed, but would that suffice in the short term if it means getting the box on the net faster? AFAICS, an ssh connection to an unprivileged account should

Re: [HACKERS] Gerbil build farm failure

2005-09-22 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:03:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes: Now that we have backtrace, does anyone have a clue about the cause/fix? The backtrace suggests a garbage snapshot value, but doesn't provide nearly enough info to guess where it's coming

Re: [HACKERS] Gerbil build farm failure

2005-09-20 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 01:17:10PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: I worked with Jim Nasby and we found this is the line that is failing on Gerbil in the build farm during initdb: tqual.c, line 844 in 8.0.X if (HeapTupleHeaderGetCmin(tuple) = snapshot-curcid) This particular line was