[HACKERS] History for 8.3.6 tag is a little strange

2010-09-24 Thread Jeff Davis
Doing git log tags/REL8_3_6 I see two commits after the one labeled
tag for 8.3.6. 

The other tags I checked all seem to match what I would expect. I'm not
suggesting that anything be done, I just wanted to point this out in
case something strange happened.

Regards,
Jeff Davis


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] History for 8.3.6 tag is a little strange

2010-09-24 Thread Tom Lane
Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com writes:
 Doing git log tags/REL8_3_6 I see two commits after the one labeled
 tag for 8.3.6. 

 The other tags I checked all seem to match what I would expect. I'm not
 suggesting that anything be done, I just wanted to point this out in
 case something strange happened.

Hmmm ... the files those commits touch are indeed tagged REL8_3_6 at the
later commit in the CVS repository, and I pulled out the 8.3.6 tarball
and confirmed that that has the newer versions too.

[ pokes around in mail archives ... ]

What seems to have happened is that the analyze_requires_snapshot() bug
was reported on pgsql-packagers and we concluded that it was serious
enough to justify a re-wrap; but the tarballs hadn't gone anywhere
public so we just did the deed without bumping the version number.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers