Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, overflowed snapshots, testing

2009-11-15 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 08:43 -0800, Robert Hodges wrote: I can help set up automated basic tests for hot standby using 1+1 setups on Amazon. I¹m already working on tests for warm standby for our commercial Tungsten implementation and need to solve the problem of creating tests that adapt

Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, overflowed snapshots, testing

2009-11-15 Thread Robert Hodges
On 11/15/09 2:25 AM PST, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 08:43 -0800, Robert Hodges wrote: I can help set up automated basic tests for hot standby using 1+1 setups on Amazon. I¹m already working on tests for warm standby for our commercial Tungsten

Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, overflowed snapshots, testing

2009-11-14 Thread Robert Hodges
Hi Simon and Heikki, I can help set up automated basic tests for hot standby using 1+1 setups on Amazon. I¹m already working on tests for warm standby for our commercial Tungsten implementation and need to solve the problem of creating tests that adapt flexibly across different replication

[HACKERS] Hot standby, overflowed snapshots, testing

2009-11-13 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
In GetSnapshotData(), we set subcount to -1 if the snapshot was overflowed: subcount = GetKnownAssignedTransactions(snapshot-subxip, xmin, xmax, overflow); /*

Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby, overflowed snapshots, testing

2009-11-13 Thread Simon Riggs
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 22:19 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: I got the impression earlier that you had some test environment set up to test hot standby. Can you share any details of what test cases you've run? Fair question. The Sep 15 submission happened too quickly for us to mobilise