Hi,
Could anyone tell me how to create read-only view on
PostgreSQL 9.3 ?
I've been testing updatable views and noticed that
all simple views are updatable.
When I use pg_dump for upgrading from PostgreSQL 9.2
to PostgreSQL 9.3 and if the databse has views,
all views are updatable on the
On 13 August 2013 11:43, Tomonari Katsumata
katsumata.tomon...@po.ntts.co.jp wrote:
Hi,
Could anyone tell me how to create read-only view on
PostgreSQL 9.3 ?
I've been testing updatable views and noticed that
all simple views are updatable.
When I use pg_dump for upgrading from
Hi Szymon,
Thank you for response.
Could you show an example?
I do below things on one server.
The path to database cluster and port are
different with each other.
[9.2.4]
initdb --no-locale -E UTF8
pg_ctl start
createdb testdb
psql testdb -c create table tbl(i int)
psql testdb -c insert
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Tomonari Katsumata
katsumata.tomon...@po.ntts.co.jp wrote:
Hi Szymon,
Thank you for response.
Could you show an example?
I do below things on one server.
The path to database cluster and port are
different with each other.
[9.2.4]
initdb --no-locale -E
On 08/13/2013 03:25 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Tomonari Katsumata
katsumata.tomon...@po.ntts.co.jp wrote:
Hi Szymon,
Thank you for response.
Could you show an example?
I do below things on one server.
The path to database cluster and port are
different
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Hannu Krosing ha...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 08/13/2013 03:25 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
I chatted about this on IRC for a bit. Apparently, updatability of
views is a mandatory feature in the sql standard and by relying on the
read-only-ness you were relying
On 08/13/2013 12:09 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Hannu Krosing ha...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 08/13/2013 03:25 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
I chatted about this on IRC for a bit. Apparently, updatability of
views is a mandatory feature in the sql standard and by
All,
In any case, using permissions is a somewhat leaky bandaid, since
superusers have overriding access privileges anyway. A better way to do
what the OP wants might be to have a view trigger that raises an exception.
I think it would be better to supply a script which revoked write
On 08/13/2013 06:23 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 08/13/2013 12:09 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Hannu Krosing
ha...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 08/13/2013 03:25 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
I chatted about this on IRC for a bit. Apparently, updatability of
views is
* Hannu Krosing (ha...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
If you earlier used views for granting limited read access to some views
you definitely did not want view users suddenly gain also write access to
underlying table.
You also probably did not GRANT only SELECT to your views as this was
the
Hannu Krosing ha...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
If you earlier used views for granting limited read access to some views
you definitely did not want view users suddenly gain also write access to
underlying table.
Unless you'd explicitly granted those users insert/update/delete privilege
on the
On 08/13/2013 01:33 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
In any case, using permissions is a somewhat leaky bandaid, since
superusers have overriding access privileges anyway. A better way
to do what the OP wants might be to have a view trigger that raises an
exception.
Superuser can easily disable or
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
There's no security hole here; if someone can do something that
they couldn't do before, it's because you explicitly granted them
privileges to do so.
This point is completely bogus. Very, very few applications I've run
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:24:32AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
All,
In any case, using permissions is a somewhat leaky bandaid, since
superusers have overriding access privileges anyway. A better way to do
what the OP wants might be to have a view trigger that raises an exception.
I
On 08/13/2013 11:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Hannu Krosing ha...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
If you earlier used views for granting limited read access to some views
you definitely did not want view users suddenly gain also write access to
underlying table.
Unless you'd explicitly granted those
Hi,
(2013/08/14 5:24), Josh Berkus wrote:
On 08/13/2013 11:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Hannu Krosing ha...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
If you earlier used views for granting limited read access to some
views
you definitely did not want view users suddenly gain also write
access to
underlying
16 matches
Mail list logo
