Added to TODO:
* Allow psql to display permission information using \df+ and \l+
---
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Maybe other people want to comment on this issue.
So far, \z and \dp have shown privileges
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Added to TODO:
* Allow psql to display permission information using \df+ and \l+
What about, develop a consistent way to display privilege information
for all objects in psql?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 11:41:14PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Added to TODO:
* Allow psql to display permission information using \df+ and
\l+
What about, develop a consistent way to display privilege
information for all objects in psql?
Excellent
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Added to TODO:
* Allow psql to display permission information using \df+ and \l+
What about, develop a consistent way to display privilege information
for all objects in psql?
OK, item wording updated.
--
Bruce Momjian
Maybe other people want to comment on this issue.
So far, \z and \dp have shown privileges of tables.
Now \dn+ and \db+ show the privileges of schemas and tablespaces.
Should we, for consistency, move the table privilege display to \dt+, or
should we move the schema and tablespace display to,
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Maybe other people want to comment on this issue.
So far, \z and \dp have shown privileges of tables.
Now \dn+ and \db+ show the privileges of schemas and tablespaces.
Should we, for consistency, move the table privilege display to \dt+, or
should we move the
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:41:49AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Maybe other people want to comment on this issue.
So far, \z and \dp have shown privileges of tables.
Now \dn+ and \db+ show the privileges of schemas and tablespaces.
Should we, for
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:41:49AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Maybe other people want to comment on this issue.
So far, \z and \dp have shown privileges of tables.
Now \dn+ and \db+ show the privileges of schemas and tablespaces.
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
IMHO the \dn+ output would get too wide if you do that. I'd be in favor
of using \zletter to display permissions of the object in \dletter
I think it's time to start with longer command names. Tab completion makes
it easy anyway. The short ones
Maybe other people want to comment on this issue.
So far, \z and \dp have shown privileges of tables.
Now \dn+ and \db+ show the privileges of schemas and tablespaces.
Should we, for consistency, move the table privilege display to \dt+, or
should we move the schema and tablespace display to, say
10 matches
Mail list logo