Seems this item will have to remain for 8.2. I have added this to TODO:
o Display IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters in \df+
It probably requires psql to output newlines in the proper
column, which is already on the TODO list.
On Monday 29 August 2005 00:33, Tom Lane wrote:
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On a slightly related note, I've noticed that psql isn't backward
compatible.
We have never expected psql's \d commands to work against older server
versions, and two months after feature freeze isn't
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 08:12:37AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
On Monday 29 August 2005 00:33, Tom Lane wrote:
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On a slightly related note, I've noticed that psql isn't
backward compatible.
We have never expected psql's \d commands to work against
David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 08:12:37AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
On Monday 29 August 2005 00:33, Tom Lane wrote:
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On a slightly related note, I've noticed that psql isn't
backward compatible.
We have never
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If we're going to do backwards compatibility for psql then we need to do
it in a fairly comprehensive way, not bit by bit, because we can
reasonably say either we support backwards compatibility or we don't
support backwards compatibility, but we
Tom Lane wrote:
It would be good to set some parameters before starting: how far
back is reasonable to support? pg_dump goes back to 7.0 but that's now
mostly for historical reasons, ie, 7.0 was the immediately previous
release when we started making it do backwards-compatible dumps. I'm
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've noticed that \df doesn't do quite what it might when a function
is created with named input parameters. Please find enclosed a patch
against CVS TIP that does this better.
Meanwhile, getting back to the actual merits of the patch ... this is
not
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:13:29AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've noticed that \df doesn't do quite what it might when a
function is created with named input parameters. Please find
enclosed a patch against CVS TIP that does this better.
Meanwhile,
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Speaking of said psql's columnar representations, what about the
alignment thing proposed earlier where an embedded newline doesn't
mess up the alignment of everything else? Is there some generic way
to handle this?
If that's not on TODO already, it
Folks,
I've noticed that \df doesn't do quite what it might when a function
is created with named input parameters. Please find enclosed a patch
against CVS TIP that does this better.
On a slightly related note, I've noticed that psql isn't backward
compatible. I know that it's *very* late to
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On a slightly related note, I've noticed that psql isn't backward
compatible.
We have never expected psql's \d commands to work against older server
versions, and two months after feature freeze isn't the time to start
making that happen.
11 matches
Mail list logo