Re: [HACKERS] Initdb not running on beos

2000-11-29 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Adam Haberlach writes: How does Windows manage to work? Windows NT has hard links. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/

Re: [HACKERS] Initdb not running on beos

2000-11-28 Thread Adam Haberlach
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 04:09:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Cyril VELTER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unfortunatly, there is no hard link on beos :=(. link and unlink are there, but link always return "No such file or directory". Somewhere right around here is where I am going to ask why

Re: [HACKERS] Initdb not running on beos

2000-11-28 Thread Tom Lane
Adam Haberlach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 04:09:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Somewhere right around here is where I am going to ask why we are entertaining the idea of a BeOS port in the first place... it's evidently not Unix or even trying hard to be close to Unix.

Re: [HACKERS] Initdb not running on beos

2000-11-27 Thread Tom Lane
Cyril VELTER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unfortunatly, there is no hard link on beos :=(. link and unlink are there, but link always return "No such file or directory". Somewhere right around here is where I am going to ask why we are entertaining the idea of a BeOS port in the first

Re: [HACKERS] Initdb not running on beos

2000-11-26 Thread Tom Lane
Cyril VELTER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: FATAL 2: InitReopen(logfile 0 seg 0) failed: No such file or directory Does BeOS not support link(2) ? See XLogFileInit() in src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c. regards, tom lane