I wrote:
> Pavel Stehule writes:
>> 2016-11-07 2:16 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane :
>>> So I think we should just delete these functions and adjust SPI_connect
>>> and SPI_finish so that they just push/pop a context level unconditionally.
>>> (Which will make
2016-11-07 15:47 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane :
> Pavel Stehule writes:
> > 2016-11-07 2:16 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane :
> >> So I think we should just delete these functions and adjust SPI_connect
> >> and SPI_finish so that they just push/pop a
Pavel Stehule writes:
> 2016-11-07 2:16 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane :
>> So I think we should just delete these functions and adjust SPI_connect
>> and SPI_finish so that they just push/pop a context level unconditionally.
>> (Which will make them simpler, not
2016-11-07 2:16 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane :
> The intent of SPI_push/SPI_pop seems to be to draw a boundary line between
> nested layers of SPI callers. Which is fine, but the SPI_connect and
> SPI_finish calls of the inner layer would suffice for that. AFAICS,
> the only thing
The intent of SPI_push/SPI_pop seems to be to draw a boundary line between
nested layers of SPI callers. Which is fine, but the SPI_connect and
SPI_finish calls of the inner layer would suffice for that. AFAICS,
the only thing that SPI_push/SPI_pop buy for us is the ability to detect
a missing