Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Exactly. With Fedora respecting the standard in this regard,
I'm convinced we should, too. In reviewing things based on
Peter's question, I did start to have doubts about *not*
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Exactly. With Fedora respecting the standard in this regard,
I'm convinced we should, too. In
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIR Peter is the only one who has complained about the script
being longer, and I'm really not sure why that's a big deal.
I'll take that under advisement for later. I'm not inclined to
think there's anything here worth trying to squeeze into 9.0,
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIR Peter is the only one who has complained about the script
being longer, and I'm really not sure why that's a big deal.
I'll take that under advisement for later.
Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Exactly. With Fedora respecting the standard in this regard, I'm
convinced we should, too. In reviewing things based on Peter's
question, I did start to have doubts about *not* special-casing
status -- it has its own set
On tor, 2009-08-20 at 10:31 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
(2) It doesn't exit with zero for a missing executable unless the
request is stop. It uses 5, which means program is not installed.
Using 5 is correct, but special-casing stop is kind of useless. Every
other init script I have ever
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On tor, 2009-08-20 at 10:31 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
(2) It doesn't exit with zero for a missing executable unless
the request is stop. It uses 5, which means program is not
installed.
Using 5 is correct, but special-casing stop is kind of
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
I can't see a clear case either way. I know I *have* seen scripts
which took the trouble to special-case it, but I just poked around
and found that it seems much less common than unconditionally using
exit 5. Does anyone know of an
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I think though that the answer to Peter's question is that stop
has to be special cased to some extent, because it is not supposed
to be an error to stop a service that's not running. If it's not
even installed, then a fortiori it's not running, so the
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Exactly. With Fedora respecting the standard in this regard, I'm
convinced we should, too. In reviewing things based on Peter's
question, I did start to have doubts about *not* special-casing
status -- it has its own set of values and 5 is
Kevin Grittner wrote:
Due to a thread about the neglect of the sample start scripts I took a
look at the current Linux file. There's certainly room for several
improvements, but some of them might require discussion. Attached are
a couple small changes which seem to me to be pretty tame.
Due to a thread about the neglect of the sample start scripts I took a
look at the current Linux file. There's certainly room for several
improvements, but some of them might require discussion. Attached are
a couple small changes which seem to me to be pretty tame. Hopefully
a small,
12 matches
Mail list logo