>
>
>All the delay seems to be in transferring the message from
>postgresql.org to webmail.postgresql.org ... which are the same
>machine, or at least the same IP address. What's up with that?
>
Looks like sendmail? Change your queue runs to be more aggressive. I
have an mc file on http://blu
> > Actually, the 'multi-day' delay is generally related to posts from ppl
> > that aren't subscribed to the lists that I have to approve manually ...
>
> I have been getting delayed duplicates from people (ie, Tom Lane)
addressed
> to only the hackers list (which I know he's subscribed to). Up t
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 21 August 2001 19:45, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> Actually, the 'multi-day' delay is generally related to posts from ppl
>> that aren't subscribed to the lists that I have to approve manually ...
> I have been getting delayed duplicates from peop
On Tuesday 21 August 2001 19:45, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Actually, the 'multi-day' delay is generally related to posts from ppl
> that aren't subscribed to the lists that I have to approve manually ...
I have been getting delayed duplicates from people (ie, Tom Lane) addressed
to only the hack
If it was a sendmail issue, by all means, but it isn't so no :)
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >
> > Nope, but thanks for the offer ;)
>
> Pleeeze?
>
> You won't be sorry
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Nope, but thanks for the offer ;)
Pleeeze?
You won't be sorry or disappointed!!
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Aug 20
Nope, but thanks for the offer ;)
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> >
> > > On Tuesday 21 August 2001 12:59, Serguei Mokhov wrote:
> > > > Looking at my message about the bug webpage and
> >
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 21 August 2001 12:59, Serguei Mokhov wrote:
> > > Looking at my message about the bug webpage and
> > > some other posts, I see that it was delayed for
> > > about 2h and a half. Some of the pos
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Huh? Two different machines altogether ...
Hmm. Maybe the problem is this:
$ nslookup -q=mx postgresql.org
Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
Non-authoritative answer:
postgresql.org preference = 0, mail exchanger = mail.postgresql.org
pos
Huh? Two different machines altogether ... but, I do have work to do once
the new server goes online ...
> nslookup postgresql.org
Server: localhost.hub.org
Address: 127.0.0.1
Name:postgresql.org
Address: 216.126.84.28
> nslookup webmail.postgresql.org
Server: localhost.hub.org
Addres
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 August 2001 12:59, Serguei Mokhov wrote:
> > Looking at my message about the bug webpage and
> > some other posts, I see that it was delayed for
> > about 2h and a half. Some of the post were
> > delayed for days... Why is that? Looks like
>
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The best thing to do is simply to expect propagation delay.
Actually, I just sent a gripe off to Marc about this. I've been
noticing large and variable propagation delay for a few months now,
but I just today realized that the problem is entirely local to
On Tuesday 21 August 2001 12:59, Serguei Mokhov wrote:
> Looking at my message about the bug webpage and
> some other posts, I see that it was delayed for
> about 2h and a half. Some of the post were
> delayed for days... Why is that? Looks like
> the list has problems of some sort which cause
> t
Hi All,
Looking at my message about the bug webpage and
some other posts, I see that it was delayed for
about 2h and a half. Some of the post were
delayed for days... Why is that? Looks like
the list has problems of some sort which cause
these irregular delays.
Just an annoying observation.
S.
14 matches
Mail list logo
