Re: [HACKERS] Little mess in RPM RH ?

2003-12-30 Thread Lamar Owen
On Saturday 27 December 2003 08:02 pm, Gaetano Mendola wrote: I'm founding little messy the RPM condition for redhat: Yes, it is a litle messy. My apologies. There will hopefully not be that with the 7.4.1 set that I hope to release when I get back from vacation (Saturday or Monday,

Re: [HACKERS] Little mess in RPM RH ?

2003-12-30 Thread Lamar Owen
On Sunday 28 December 2003 09:03 am, Gaetano Mendola wrote: Sander Steffann wrote: This is because when I built the RPMs for RedHat there were little differences between the different RedHat releases that caused the builds to fail. I had to make minor adjustments for each platform, which is

Re: [HACKERS] Little mess in RPM RH ?

2003-12-28 Thread Sander Steffann
Hi, Inside the RH9.0 coesist the 7.4.0-0.3 and 7.4.0-0.5 versions looking on other RH directory version I found that actually 7.4.0-0.2 7.4.0-0.3 7.4.0-0.4 7.4.0-0.5 are existing. Inside the SRPMS directory is present only the 7.4.0-0.2 version! This is because when I built the RPMs

Re: [HACKERS] Little mess in RPM RH ?

2003-12-28 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Sander Steffann wrote: Hi, Inside the RH9.0 coesist the 7.4.0-0.3 and 7.4.0-0.5 versions looking on other RH directory version I found that actually 7.4.0-0.2 7.4.0-0.3 7.4.0-0.4 7.4.0-0.5 are existing. Inside the SRPMS directory is present only the 7.4.0-0.2 version! This is because when I

[HACKERS] Little mess in RPM RH ?

2003-12-27 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Hi all, I'm founding little messy the RPM condition for redhat: Inside the RH9.0 coesist the 7.4.0-0.3 and 7.4.0-0.5 versions looking on other RH directory version I found that actually 7.4.0-0.2 7.4.0-0.3 7.4.0-0.4 7.4.0-0.5 are existing. Inside the SRPMS directory is present only the 7.4.0-0.2