On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> The C collation is treated exactly the same as other collations when
> considering whether the generation of abbreviated keys for text should
> continue. This doesn't make much sense. With text, the big cost that
> we are concerned about go
The C collation is treated exactly the same as other collations when
considering whether the generation of abbreviated keys for text should
continue. This doesn't make much sense. With text, the big cost that
we are concerned about going to waste should abbreviated keys not
capture sufficient entro
