Re: [HACKERS] Missing OID define

2012-10-08 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote: > Phil Sorber wrote: >> Thom Brown and I were doing some hacking the other day and came across >> this missing define. We argued over who was going to send the patch in >> and I lost. So here it is. > > +1 > > I have been missing this #define. A

Re: [HACKERS] Missing OID define

2012-10-05 Thread Albe Laurenz
Phil Sorber wrote: > Thom Brown and I were doing some hacking the other day and came across > this missing define. We argued over who was going to send the patch in > and I lost. So here it is. +1 I have been missing this #define. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pg

Re: [HACKERS] Missing OID define

2012-10-03 Thread Thom Brown
On 2 October 2012 15:47, Phil Sorber wrote: > Thom Brown and I were doing some hacking the other day and came across > this missing define. We argued over who was going to send the patch in > and I lost. So here it is. Capital idea. +1 -- Thom -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-ha

[HACKERS] Missing OID define

2012-10-02 Thread Phil Sorber
Thom Brown and I were doing some hacking the other day and came across this missing define. We argued over who was going to send the patch in and I lost. So here it is. pg_type_uuid_oid.diff Description: Binary data -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make c