Re: [HACKERS] My review for the patch Table command
Unicron, 4. Since it is just an alternative to select * from Table, I think this feature is unneccessary. Heh. I agree, but tell that to the SQL committee. I don't think we need to argue out the merits of adding standard syntax. This patch is Ready for Code Review. --Josh -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] My review for the patch Table command
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unicron, 4. Since it is just an alternative to select * from Table, I think this feature is unneccessary. Heh. I agree, but tell that to the SQL committee. I don't think we need to argue out the merits of adding standard syntax. We can, however, argue the merits of making extensive documentation changes to document such a useless feature. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[HACKERS] My review for the patch Table command
Hi I have completed the review for Patch Table command, Here is results 1. The patch actually implements that. 2. The feature work as advertised. 3. So far, I have not found any possible dangers that can be caused by this pacth 4. Since it is just an alternative to select * from Table, I think this feature is unneccessary. Unicron
