mlw,
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:25:02PM -0400, mlw wrote:
A binary version of PostgreSQL for Windows should not use the cygwin
dll. I know and understand there is some disagreement with this position,
but in this I'm sure about this.
Sorry, but I'm not going to touch the above -- even with a
A binary version of PostgreSQL for Windows should not use the cygwin
dll. I know and understand there is some disagreement with this
position, but in this I'm sure about this.
That may ultimately be desirable.
In the short term, it is likely preferable to use cygwin.
It is only necessary to
A binary version of PostgreSQL for Windows should not use the cygwin dll. I
know and understand there is some disagreement with this position, but in this
I'm sure about this.
The tools used to create the binary need not be Microsoft, many venders have
used Borland or Watcom, the run of the mill
On Sat, 2002-05-11 at 02:25, mlw wrote:
A binary version of PostgreSQL for Windows should not use the cygwin dll. I
know and understand there is some disagreement with this position, but in this
I'm sure about this.
...
I believe we can use the cygwin development environment, and direct
