Re: [HACKERS] Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation

2012-01-23 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On 22 January 2012 05:30, Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: The syntax for constants is sufficiently simple that I think that a good set of regression tests should make this entirely practicable, covering all permutations of relevant factors affecting how the implementation should

Re: [HACKERS] Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation

2012-01-22 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: So, having received feedback from Tom and others in relation to this patch, I would like to state how I think I should go about addressing various concerns to ensure that a revision of the patch gets into the 9.2

Re: [HACKERS] Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation

2012-01-22 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: So, having received feedback from Tom and others in relation to this patch, I would like to state how I think I should go about addressing

[HACKERS] Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation

2012-01-21 Thread Peter Geoghegan
So, having received feedback from Tom and others in relation to this patch, I would like to state how I think I should go about addressing various concerns to ensure that a revision of the patch gets into the 9.2 release. As I've said time and again, I think that it is very important that we have