Tom Lane wrote:
"Gaetano Mendola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Of course you realize that referencing any table at all in an
"immutable" function is probably a mortal sin...)
Yes Tom I know, in our case
"Gaetano Mendola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Of course you realize that referencing any table at all in an
>> "immutable" function is probably a mortal sin...)
> Yes Tom I know, in our case that table is a lookup table, noo
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > we have faced lately dumps not valid, the bug can be replicated using a
> 8.2.9 or
> > a 8.3.1 server.
>
> > These are the steps to create the database that will generate a not va
Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> we have faced lately dumps not valid, the bug can be replicated using a 8.2.9
> or
> a 8.3.1 server.
> These are the steps to create the database that will generate a not valid
> dump:
This is a bug in your function: it will not work if the search p
Hi all,
we have faced lately dumps not valid, the bug can be replicated using a 8.2.9 or
a 8.3.1 server.
These are the steps to create the database that will generate a not valid dump:
---
CREATE TABLE t_public (
a integer
);
CREATE OR REPL
