On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> Couldn't cleanup code continue to work just the same way though? The
> only extra structure is an intrusive freelist, but that could be
> completely ignored by code that wants to scan the whole array after
>
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Thomas Munro
> wrote:
>> This is just a thought for discussion, no patch attached...
>>
>> DSM operations dsm_create(), dsm_attach(), dsm_unpin_segment()
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> This is just a thought for discussion, no patch attached...
>
> DSM operations dsm_create(), dsm_attach(), dsm_unpin_segment() perform
> linear searches of the dsm_control->item array for either a free slot
> or
Hi hackers,
This is just a thought for discussion, no patch attached...
DSM operations dsm_create(), dsm_attach(), dsm_unpin_segment() perform
linear searches of the dsm_control->item array for either a free slot
or a slot matching a given handle. Maybe no one thinks this is a
problem, because