Re: [HACKERS] Obsolete comment in postgres_fdw.c

2016-03-14 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote: >> It was left there intentionally to document all the conditions in one >> place (some from the core and some from the FDW itself), for a ready >> reference. In case tomorrow core thinks that matching user mapping

Re: [HACKERS] Obsolete comment in postgres_fdw.c

2016-03-14 Thread Etsuro Fujita
On 2016/03/14 16:42, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita > wrote: Here is the comments for foreign_join_ok in postgres_fdw.c: /* * Assess whether the join between inner and outer

Re: [HACKERS] Obsolete comment in postgres_fdw.c

2016-03-14 Thread Ashutosh Bapat
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > Hi, > > Here is the comments for foreign_join_ok in postgres_fdw.c: > > /* > * Assess whether the join between inner and outer relations can be > pushed down > * to the foreign server. As a side effect, save

[HACKERS] Obsolete comment in postgres_fdw.c

2016-03-13 Thread Etsuro Fujita
Hi, Here is the comments for foreign_join_ok in postgres_fdw.c: /* * Assess whether the join between inner and outer relations can be pushed down * to the foreign server. As a side effect, save information we obtain in this * function to PgFdwRelationInfo passed in. * * Joins that satisfy