On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
snip
The INSTR implementation in the docs will instead search backwards from the
end of the string if you tell it to start at 0, same as if you gave it a
negative input. I think it's therefore possible to get the plpgsql
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
I can confirm that Oracle returns 0 if the third argument to
INSTR is 0.
Can someone provide a suitable doc patch?
Thanks, committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The
Robert Haas wrote:
I can confirm that Oracle returns 0 if the third argument to
INSTR is 0.
Can someone provide a suitable doc patch?
Here you are.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
instr-doc.patch
Description: instr-doc.patch
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
Greg Smith wrote:
A web site doc comment from user skong today points out a small issue
around the sample INSTR function given in plpgsql-porting.html that I
can't confirm (none of those dirty Oracle instances here today), but
it
sounds legit.
A look at Oracle's documentation on the INSTR
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at wrote:
I can confirm that Oracle returns 0 if the third argument to
INSTR is 0.
Can someone provide a suitable doc patch?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent
A web site doc comment from user skong today points out a small issue
around the sample INSTR function given in plpgsql-porting.html that I
can't confirm (none of those dirty Oracle instances here today), but it
sounds legit.
A look at Oracle's documentation on the INSTR function at
