On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:49 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
1. It seems to me that the proposed design for pg_partition is poorly
thought out. In particular, I don't see how this would work if we
wanted to partition on multiple keys, which is a feature supported by
both Oracle and MySQL. It would
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Agreed. If all we are doing is adding synonyms for existing feature then
its not good enough. We need a new syntax that does not need to be
backwards compatible, allowing various code streamlining and more
targeting to the desired use case. Inheritance
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've taken a little bit more of a look at this patch and I guess I'm
not too happy with the design.
Thanks. I was thinking about only syntax for partitioning in the patch,
but I need more consideration about insert-aware catalog design.
5. The use of
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Takahiro Itagaki
itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp wrote:
5. The use of the term partition is not very consistent. For
example, we use CREATE PARTITION to create a partition, but we use
DROP TABLE to get rid of it (there is no DROP PARTITION). I think
that the
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Takahiro Itagaki
itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This one, doesn't apply to head anymore... please update
Thank you for reviewing my patch!
I attached an updated patch set for partitioning syntax.
I've taken
2010/6/18 Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp:
Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This one, doesn't apply to head anymore... please update
Thank you for reviewing my patch!
I attached an updated patch set for partitioning syntax.
Isn't this linked from the RF web
Hitoshi Harada umi.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/18 Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp:
I attached an updated patch set for partitioning syntax.
Isn't this linked from the RF web app??
It should have been. Neither the reviewer nor the author updated
the CF web page (as
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
It should have been. Neither the reviewer nor the author updated
the CF web page (as they should have done). I've just made the
entries to bring the patch it up to date in the web app.
Yeah! sorry i got
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Takahiro Itagaki
itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple of preliminary comments on this:
Thanks.
The attached is rebased on HEAD, with additional documentation.
This one, doesn't apply to head anymore...
Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This one, doesn't apply to head anymore... please update
Thank you for reviewing my patch!
I attached an updated patch set for partitioning syntax.
The latest codes are available at: http://repo.or.cz/w/pgsql-fdw.git
(I'm recycling FDW repo for the
Here is a revised partitioning syntax patch. It implements only syntax and
on-disk structure mentioned below:
Table Partitioning#Syntax
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Table_partitioning#Syntax
Table Partitioning#On-disk structure
Here is a revised partitioning syntax patch. It implements only syntax and
on-disk structure mentioned below:
Table Partitioning#Syntax
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Table_partitioning#Syntax
Table Partitioning#On-disk structure
Dmitry Fefelov fo...@ac-sw.com wrote:
Here is a revised partitioning syntax patch. It implements only syntax and
on-disk structure mentioned below:
Table Partitioning#Syntax
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Table_partitioning#Syntax
Table Partitioning#On-disk structure
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:55:45PM +0600, Dmitry Fefelov wrote:
Here is a revised partitioning syntax patch. It implements only syntax and
on-disk structure mentioned below:
Table Partitioning#Syntax
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Table_partitioning#Syntax
Table
Will 9.1 partitions allow to reference partitioned tables in foreign keys?
For now, you can do something like this:
http://people.planetpostgresql.org/dfetter/index.php?/archives/51-
Partitioning-Is-Such-Sweet-Sorrow.html
Cheers,
David.
Already did ;) But workable plain references
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Takahiro Itagaki
itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple of preliminary comments on this:
Thanks.
The attached is rebased on HEAD, with additional documentation.
1. If we're thinking that this syntax should
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
people get bogged down and don't have time to finish the work.
Ok, I moved this patch to the next commit fest for 9.1 alpha 1.
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Takahiro Itagaki
itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Here is a revised partitioning syntax patch. It implements only syntax and
on-disk structure mentioned below:
Table Partitioning#Syntax
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Table_partitioning#Syntax
18 matches
Mail list logo
