On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 7:20 PM, John Naylor jcnay...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
Following up on my experimental patch last month to revamp the BKI
infrastructure, I am proposing a less invasive set of changes with the
hope of offering something committable. Some of these were discussed
by
Hi,
On Monday 21 December 2009 02:23:39 Robert Haas wrote:
A more important point is whether we really need to make this
dependent on Perl 5.6 or later. What features are we using here that
actually require Perl 5.6? I suspect the answer is none, but we
don't like writing the code in a way
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On Monday 21 December 2009 02:23:39 Robert Haas wrote:
A more important point is whether we really need to make this
dependent on Perl 5.6 or later.
I dont see a platform without perl 5.6 where a new enough flex/bison is
available...
That argument
On Monday 21 December 2009 04:23:57 Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On Monday 21 December 2009 02:23:39 Robert Haas wrote:
A more important point is whether we really need to make this
dependent on Perl 5.6 or later.
I dont see a platform without perl 5.6 where
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On Monday 21 December 2009 04:23:57 Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On Monday 21 December 2009 02:23:39 Robert Haas wrote:
A more important point is whether we really need to make this
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On Monday 21 December 2009 02:23:39 Robert Haas wrote:
A more important point is whether we really need to make this
dependent on Perl 5.6 or later.
I dont see a platform without
