Re: [HACKERS] Patch queue - wiki (was varadic patch)

2008-04-04 Thread Dave Page
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That seems like a *really* odd thing for one of the founders of the world's most advanced OSS DBMS project to say. It's all relational (which we do do pretty well) - we can add links to the wiki to threads in the

Re: [HACKERS] Patch queue - wiki (was varadic patch)

2008-04-04 Thread Greg Smith
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Dave Page wrote: We must be talking at cross purposes because I really cannot believe you're asking me how to add a link to a wiki page :-o He wants to know how to automate turning an entire mbox file full of them into wiki markup, now how to do one at a time. Other

Re: [HACKERS] Patch queue - wiki (was varadic patch)

2008-04-03 Thread Dave Page
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is not clear to me how a wiki can be easily created for 2k emails and then maintained in a reasonable way, or how emails can be added to it easily. That seems like a *really* odd thing for one of the founders of the

Re: [HACKERS] Patch queue - wiki (was varadic patch)

2008-04-03 Thread Aidan Van Dyk
The one concern I have with the way the last commitfest went (and I say this as strictly an observer), there was no discussion on anything. Now, I know that discussion happened, but it happened somewhere, in some web-forum, in a community that seems to generally promote mailing lists as the

Re: [HACKERS] Patch queue - wiki (was varadic patch)

2008-04-03 Thread Tom Lane
Aidan Van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The one concern I have with the way the last commitfest went (and I say this as strictly an observer), there was no discussion on anything. Umm ... in the first place, the fest isn't over yet. In the second place, the reason you haven't seen much

Re: [HACKERS] Patch queue - wiki (was varadic patch)

2008-04-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Dave Page wrote: On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is not clear to me how a wiki can be easily created for 2k emails and then maintained in a reasonable way, or how emails can be added to it easily. That seems like a *really* odd thing for one

[HACKERS] Patch queue - wiki (was varadic patch)

2008-04-02 Thread Greg Smith
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Bruce Momjian wrote: The new permanent ones are permanent against mailbox movement, and in fact the comments and thread merging also travels with the email. The someone replied to your comment links in e-messages I've been getting the last few days have all been working,

Re: [HACKERS] Patch queue - wiki (was varadic patch)

2008-04-02 Thread Tom Lane
Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Those hacking on tools to convert Bruce's currently preferred working form (that revolves around mbox files) into something else that's web oriented are stuck with considering how all the above information is going to be handled before everybody will be

Re: [HACKERS] Patch queue - wiki (was varadic patch)

2008-04-02 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: For the past couple of weeks I've been dealing with both Bruce's queue and the one at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest:March and frankly I find the latter a *whole* lot more satisfactory, despite the fact that it's got exactly zero custom tooling or infrastructure

Re: [HACKERS] Patch queue - wiki (was varadic patch)

2008-04-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: For the past couple of weeks I've been dealing with both Bruce's queue and the one at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest:March and frankly I find the latter a *whole* lot more satisfactory, despite the fact that it's got exactly zero custom tooling or infrastructure