In the original patch I had Pause/Resume feature for controlling
recovery during Hot Standby. It was removed for lack of time.
With all the discussion around the HS UI, it would be something that
could be back very easily.
I would like to do it as a recovery control plugin. The plugin would be
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
In the original patch I had Pause/Resume feature for controlling
recovery during Hot Standby. It was removed for lack of time.
With all the discussion around the HS UI, it would be something that
could be back very easily.
Please!
Manual control
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
In the original patch I had Pause/Resume feature for controlling
recovery during Hot Standby. It was removed for lack of time.
Well, it's not like we have more time now than we did then. I think
we need to postpone this
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 09:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
In the original patch I had Pause/Resume feature for controlling
recovery during Hot Standby. It was removed for lack of time.
Well, it's not like we have more
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
In the original patch I had Pause/Resume feature for controlling
recovery during Hot Standby. It was removed for lack of time.
With all the discussion around the HS UI, it would be something that
could be back very easily.
Sure. In 9.1. You have
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
In the original patch I had Pause/Resume feature for controlling
recovery during Hot Standby. It was removed for lack of time.
With all the discussion around the HS UI, it would be something that
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This is clearly a response to issues raised about HS and not a new
feature.
I don't find that clear at all. In fact, I find the exact opposition
position to be clear.
It's also proposed in the most minimal way possible
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
There hasn't been anything more than a minor bug in weeks, so not really
sure how you arrive at that the idea the code needs stabilising.
Simon, if you don't think the code needs stabilizing, you need to think
again.
* max_standby_delay logic is
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 13:23 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
There hasn't been anything more than a minor bug in weeks, so not really
sure how you arrive at that the idea the code needs stabilising.
Simon, if you don't think the code needs stabilizing, you
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 13:23 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
* max_standby_delay logic is broken, as per other thread.
Proposed fix submitted,
* handle_standby_sig_alarm is broken to the point of needing to be
thrown away; you can NOT do that kind of thing in an interrupt handler.
This was modelled
10 matches
Mail list logo
