Stephen, what is the status of your efforts?
The latest one I could found is the colprivs_wip.20080902.diff.gz.
Do you have any updated one?
Snowman told me this week that he was working hard on it -- he declined
to be a reviewer for that reason.
--Josh
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
KaiGai, et al,
* KaiGai Kohei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen, what is the status of your efforts?
I've now got it passing the base regression tests with the actual logic
included in the path. That doesn't mean it works completely, of course,
but I feel like I'm making progress. Feedback,
Robert Haas wrote:
One other random note - I don't believe there has been a new version
of the column-level permissions patch that Stephen Frost was working
on since the last commitfest. Unless someone disagrees with Markus
Wanner's conclusion that it wasn't ready for commit at that point,
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 23:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Earlier today I had a different thought about how to sort things early
in the fest. I think that there is a strong temptation to finish off
the simple patches quickly so as to reduce the size of the list ---
I know I've done that and I
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
One other random note - I don't believe there has been a new version
of the column-level permissions patch that Stephen Frost was working
on since the last commitfest. Unless someone disagrees with Markus
Wanner's conclusion that it wasn't ready for
(1) moving all of the patches committed prior to 11/1 to a separate
section or page
Why?
To reduce clutter, but I don't feel strongly about it.
(2) sorting the pending patches by complexity or subject matter
Sorting them by complexity would be great, if I thought I could do it. I'm
not
Patch submitters,
Please make sure your patches are on the November CommitFest wiki page, with
correct and updated links.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest_2008-11
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL
San Francisco
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make
I wonder if we should consider:
(1) moving all of the patches committed prior to 11/1 to a separate
section or page
(2) sorting the pending patches by complexity or subject matter
...Robert
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patch submitters,
Please make
Robert,
(1) moving all of the patches committed prior to 11/1 to a separate
section or page
Why?
(2) sorting the pending patches by complexity or subject matter
Sorting them by complexity would be great, if I thought I could do it. I'm
not sure I can.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL
San
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(2) sorting the pending patches by complexity or subject matter
Sorting them by complexity would be great, if I thought I could do it. I'm
not sure I can.
We organized them by subject matter (or code area, really) in a couple
of the earlier fests. I
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 20:12, Tom Lane wrote:
Earlier today I had a different thought about how to sort things early
in the fest. I think that there is a strong temptation to finish off
the simple patches quickly so as to reduce the size of the list ---
I know I've done that and I think
11 matches
Mail list logo
