On 7/21/14 10:06 AM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> 6. The tests fail if your $LANG isn't en_something:
This was fixed.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 7/17/14 3:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> My Salesforce colleagues have been complaining that the TAP tests added
> in 9.4 don't work terribly well for them. I've been poking at this,
> and I believe this is a reasonably complete list of the problems:
Quick followup:
> 1. "make [install]check-world"
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> On 07/21/2014 02:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I had the same feeling about the Perl on RHEL6 ;-). The TAP tests
>>> will need to be a great deal more portable than they've proven so far
>>> before they'll really be usefu
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 07/21/2014 02:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I had the same feeling about the Perl on RHEL6 ;-). The TAP tests
>> will need to be a great deal more portable than they've proven so far
>> before they'll really be useful for anything much. I trust we're
>> committed to makin
On 07/21/2014 02:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas writes:
Mmph. Well, I don't want to install a non-default Perl on my system
just to make these tests pass, and I don't think that should be a
requirement.
I had the same feeling about the Perl on RHEL6 ;-). The TAP tests
will need to be a
Robert Haas writes:
> Mmph. Well, I don't want to install a non-default Perl on my system
> just to make these tests pass, and I don't think that should be a
> requirement.
I had the same feeling about the Perl on RHEL6 ;-). The TAP tests
will need to be a great deal more portable than they've
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Thomas Fanghaenel
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> The tests weren't running for me at all on MacOS X, because I was
>> missing some prerequisite. So I installed it, and now they promptly
>> fail:
>>
>> ok 2 - initdb --version
>>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> The tests weren't running for me at all on MacOS X, because I was
> missing some prerequisite. So I installed it, and now they promptly
> fail:
>
> ok 2 - initdb --version
> 1..2
> ok 1 - initdb with invalid option nonzero exit code
>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Noah Misch 2014-07-18 <20140718052625.ga2231...@tornado.leadboat.com>
>> Installing a new version of one Perl module is well within the capabilities
>> of
>> buildfarm owners. Saving them the trouble, which in turn means more of them
Re: Noah Misch 2014-07-18 <20140718052625.ga2231...@tornado.leadboat.com>
> Installing a new version of one Perl module is well within the capabilities of
> buildfarm owners. Saving them the trouble, which in turn means more of them
> actually activating the TAP tests, might justify the loss. I'd
Noah Misch writes:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:31:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 4. IPC::Run isn't installed by default on RHEL, and probably not on other
>> distros either. If there's a reasonably painless way to remove this
>> dependency, it'd improve the portability of the tests. This is low
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:31:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> My Salesforce colleagues have been complaining that the TAP tests added
> in 9.4 don't work terribly well for them. I've been poking at this,
> and I believe this is a reasonably complete list of the problems:
> 3. Many of the tests depe
My Salesforce colleagues have been complaining that the TAP tests added
in 9.4 don't work terribly well for them. I've been poking at this,
and I believe this is a reasonably complete list of the problems:
1. "make [install]check-world" tries to run the TAP tests even when
"prove" was not found b
13 matches
Mail list logo
