On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 14:35, Richard Huxton wrote:
> With plperl.on_init allowing the loading of modules, might there be some
> merit (and little cost) in allowing the same style of function-mapping as
> with C functions?
>
> CREATE FUNCTION add_one(integer) RETURNS integer
> AS 'DIRECTORY/f
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Richard Huxton wrote:
> With plperl.on_init allowing the loading of modules, might there be some
> merit (and little cost) in allowing the same style of function-mapping as
> with C functions?
>
> CREATE FUNCTION add_one(integer) RETURNS integer
> AS 'DIRECTORY
With plperl.on_init allowing the loading of modules, might there be some
merit (and little cost) in allowing the same style of function-mapping
as with C functions?
CREATE FUNCTION add_one(integer) RETURNS integer
AS 'DIRECTORY/funcs', 'add_one'
LANGUAGE C STRICT;
CREATE FUNCTION add
