On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 19:50:21 -0300, Steve Howe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Proposal #1 (author: Steve Howe):
-
PQcmdStatus() == Should return the last executed command
#1a
or the same as the original command
#1b = #2
PQcmdTuples() == should
Hello Peter,
Monday, September 9, 2002, 3:41:41 PM, you wrote:
PE Steve Howe writes:
Here are the proposals for solutioning the Return proper effected
tuple count from complex commands [return] issue as seen on TODO.
Any comments ?... This is obviously open to voting and discussion.
PE We
Hello Bruce,
Monday, September 9, 2002, 12:21:11 AM, you wrote:
BM Steve Howe wrote:
Hello Bruce,
But this *is* the total number of rows affected. There is no current
(defined) behavior of rows affected by the same kind of command
issued, although I agree it makes some sense.
BM Yes,
Hello all,
Here are the proposals for solutioning the Return proper effected
tuple count from complex commands [return] issue as seen on TODO.
Any comments ?... This is obviously open to voting and discussion.
--
Best regards,
Steve Howe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Bruce,
Sunday, September 8, 2002, 10:52:45 PM, you wrote:
BM I liked option #2. I don't think the _last_ query in a rule should have
BM any special handling.
BM So, to summarize #2, we have:
BM if no INSTEAD,
BM return value of original command
The problem is, this
