On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Here's how I think it needs to look:
[ move all the functionality to the backend ]
Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got something that is
of exactly zero use to
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Here's how I think it needs to look:
[ move all the functionality to the backend ]
Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got something that is
of exactly zero use to
On 03/21/2014 09:38 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Here's how I think it needs to look:
[ move all the functionality to the backend ]
Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got
Andrew Dunstan escribió:
What would be useful for many purposes, and is a long-standing
project of mine that I still haven't found time to make progress on,
is that the server should contain functions to produce the creation
SQL for all its own objects, free of the locks that pg_dump requires
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Alexandr askel...@gmail.com wrote:
Rewrite (add) pg_dump and pg_restore utilities as libraries (.so, .dll
.dylib)
This strikes me as (1) pretty vague and (2) probably too hard for a
summer project.
I mean, getting the existing binaries to build libraries that
On 03/21/2014 09:28 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Alexandr askel...@gmail.com wrote:
Rewrite (add) pg_dump and pg_restore utilities as libraries (.so, .dll
.dylib)
This strikes me as (1) pretty vague and (2) probably too hard for a
summer project.
I mean,
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Here's how I think it needs to look:
[ move all the functionality to the backend ]
Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got something that is
of exactly zero use to its supposed principal use-case, pg_dump. pg_dump
will still have to
On 03/21/2014 11:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Here's how I think it needs to look:
[ move all the functionality to the backend ]
Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got something that is
of exactly zero use to its supposed principal
Hello!
Here is the text of my proposal which I've applied to GSoC.
(and link
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s-Q4rzEysPxo-dINsk_eKFJOBoVjNYDrQ-Oh75gtYEM/edit?usp=sharing)
Any suggestions and comments are welcome.
*
PostgreSQL GSoC 2014 proposal
Project name
Rewrite (add) pg_dump and
