Re: [HACKERS] REVIEW: "writable CTEs" - doc patch

2011-01-21 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 03:48, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > I think that a major goal of the DocBook format is that it separates > content from presentation, so whatever tool is used to render that > content as HTML for .org isn't necessarily publicly available. Sure it is. And FWIW, it just uses the

Re: [HACKERS] REVIEW: "writable CTEs" - doc patch

2011-01-19 Thread Peter Geoghegan
I think that a major goal of the DocBook format is that it separates content from presentation, so whatever tool is used to render that content as HTML for .org isn't necessarily publicly available. -- Regards, Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] REVIEW: "writable CTEs" - doc patch

2011-01-19 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > Greetings, > > * Peter Geoghegan (peter.geoghega...@gmail.com) wrote: >> I do this all the time. Anyway, I intend for this doc patch to be >> backported to 8.4 as a bugfix, which is part of the reason why it >> isn't invasive - it's just a cl

[HACKERS] REVIEW: "writable CTEs" - doc patch

2011-01-19 Thread Stephen Frost
Greetings, * Peter Geoghegan (peter.geoghega...@gmail.com) wrote: > I do this all the time. Anyway, I intend for this doc patch to be > backported to 8.4 as a bugfix, which is part of the reason why it > isn't invasive - it's just a clarification. Clearly if it makes sense > for 9.1, it makes just