On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:31:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Why exactly was this thought to be a good idea:
> >>
> >>> * A NULL original expression disables use of transform functions while
> >>> * retaining all other
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:55:52AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > Add notion of a "transform function" that can simplify function calls.
>
> Why exactly was this thought to be a good idea:
>
> > * A NULL original expression disables use of transform functions while
> > * retain
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> Add notion of a "transform function" that can simplify function calls.
>
> Why exactly was this thought to be a good idea:
>
>> * A NULL original expression disables use of transform functions while
>> * retaining all othe
