Hi,
On 2013-07-19 08:23:25 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The changes here make it impossible to write a bgworker which properly
works in 9.3 and 9.4. Was that intended? If so, the commit message
should mention the
Andres Freund escribió:
On 2013-07-19 08:23:25 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
And I'd also propose getting rid
of bgw_sighup and bgw_sigterm in both branches, while we're at it.
AFAICT, they don't add any functionality, and they're basically
unusable for dynamically started background
