[ continuing a discussion from last August ]
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce Momjian writes:
My assumption is that we never came up with any solution to this, right?
It stopped when we noticed that proper support for non-finite values will
break indexing, because the
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was thinking about making NaN equivalent to NULL.
Mumble ... in the thread last August, someone made the point that SQL's
idea of NULL (unknown value) is not really the same as a NaN (I know
that this is not a well-defined number). Even though
My assumption is that we never came up with any solution to this, right?
On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 12:33:00AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
snip side comment about bug tracking. My input: for an email controllable
system, take a look at the debian bug tracking system
Show me a system
