On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 02:48:58PM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > (I will refrain for the moment from speculating whether we'll ever
> > have an index type that supports regexp match directly as an
> > indexable operator...)
>
> Fwiw I looked into
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> (I will refrain for
> the moment from speculating whether we'll ever have an index type that
> supports regexp match directly as an indexable operator...)
Fwiw I looked into this at one point and have some ideas if anyone is
keen to try it.
--
