On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2011-05-06 at 21:53 +0200, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> >
> > I think it might be better if the association don't need (or have )
> > activity other than 'technical' and to set up another nonprofit
> > association for real activity.
>
Chris,
> Not totally Idle thought: it would be nice if the "holding
> corporation" doesn't need a bank account, as they impose burdens of
> fees (not huge, but not providing us notable value), and more
> importantly, impose administrative burdens. Our banks like to impose
> holds on accounts any t
I quite agree with Peter's comments. Keeping this corporation as simple to
manage as possible is a considerably valuable feature. If we find we need
an "activity corporation," it won't be all that difficult to found that, and
it's worth noting that *that* organization would need to have a
substan
On fre, 2011-05-06 at 21:53 +0200, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> > If someone gets motivated to build up Canadian community activity,
> the
> > membership of the NPO could be expanded in the future, and new board
> > members could be elected. Otherwise, the nonprofit could run under
> a
> > stewardshi
2011/5/6 Josh Berkus :
> Hackers, Community members:
>
> As some of you already know, several important community assets are held
> in the personal name of Marc Fournier for historical reasons. These
> assets include several DNS domains (including postgresql.org), our SSL
> key, and a Canadian tra
Christopher Browne writes:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Gilberto Castillo Martínez
> wrote:
>> This would imply improvement in the terms of the U.S. embargo on Cuba.
> I wouldn't get overly optimistic about that - the purpose of this is a
> bit less "sweeping" than you may be thinking.
> T
On 05/06/2011 03:30 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
If the corporation became *really active* in extra senses (e.g. -
handling donations, operating events), that would add some Canadian
activity that doesn't exist today, but it's not clear that it would
necessarily get "really active" that way.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Gilberto Castillo Martínez
wrote:
> Josh,
>
> This would imply improvement in the terms of the U.S. embargo on Cuba.
>
> What would be real beneficial to all regional communities.
I wouldn't get overly optimistic about that - the purpose of this is a
bit less "swee
Josh,
This would imply improvement in the terms of the U.S. embargo on Cuba.
What would be real beneficial to all regional communities.
--
Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
Edificio Beijing. Miramar Trade Center. Etecsa.
Miramar, La Habana.Cuba.
---
This message was processed by Kaspersky Mail Gate
