[HACKERS] Re: Changes to include files

2001-01-19 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 01:58:20PM +, Thomas Lockhart wrote: I haven't been able to update my cvs sources for a few days, but on my machine preproc.y produces 321 shift/reduce errors. Does it still, or is that patched up? Hmm, I never saw that:

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changes to include files

2001-01-19 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Seems to work fine here. But it's pgc.c that does not work anymore: gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I../../../../src/include -I./../include -DMAJOR_VERSION=2 -DMINOR_VERSION=8 -DPATCHLEVEL=0

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changes to include files

2001-01-19 Thread Michael Meskes
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:29:15AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Did you get the update I made on 1/14 to #include "postgres.h" at the head of pgc.l ? No, that one is missing. Thanks. I'll add it immediately. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian

[HACKERS] Re: Changes to include files

2001-01-18 Thread Thomas Lockhart
Could anyone please tell me what changed in some of the include files. I just noticed that ecpg won't compile anymore. I haven't been able to update my cvs sources for a few days, but on my machine preproc.y produces 321 shift/reduce errors. Does it still, or is that patched up?

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changes to include files

2001-01-18 Thread Bruce Momjian
Could anyone please tell me what changed in some of the include files. I just noticed that ecpg won't compile anymore. I haven't been able to update my cvs sources for a few days, but on my machine preproc.y produces 321 shift/reduce errors. Does it still, or is that patched up? In