On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:17:36AM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> I may be forgetting something obvious here but is there even a
> function to send an interrupt signal? That would trigger the same
> behaviour that a user hitting C-c would trigger which would only be
> handled at the next CHECK_FOR_INTE
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hrm, I think we're talking at cross-purposes here.
>
> Me: "This mechanism hasn't been tested enough, and may still have nasty bugs."
>
> You: "Then let's invent some entirely new mechanism."
>
> I'm not seeing how that responds to the concern.
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 05:28:11PM -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
> Noah offered me these comments:
> > This patch still changes the policy for pg_terminate_backend(), and it does
> > not fix other SIGINT senders like processCancelRequest() and ProcSleep().
> > ?If
> > you're concerned about PID-reus
