On 9/12/17 15:37, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/11/17 14:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 9/10/17 12:14, Noah Misch wrote:
>>> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly
>>> send
>>> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent
>>>
On 9/11/17 14:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/10/17 12:14, Noah Misch wrote:
>> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
>> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent
>> status
>> update. Refer to the policy on open item
On 9/10/17 12:14, Noah Misch wrote:
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
>
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 04:53:12AM +, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:28:47PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Arseny Sher wrote:
> > > Arseny Sher writes:
> > >
> > >> Attached patch fixes this by
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:28:47PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Arseny Sher wrote:
> > Arseny Sher writes:
> >
> >> Attached patch fixes this by stopping workers before RO drop, as
> >> already done in case when we