[HACKERS] Re: Final call for platform testing

2001-04-07 Thread Jeff Duffy
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:10:12 -0700, Nathan Myers alluded: I saw three separate reports of successful builds on Linux 2.4.2 on x86 (including mine), but it isn't listed here. [jeff@cairhien pronto]$ /var/postgresql/bin/psql -V psql (PostgreSQL) 7.1RC1 contains history support ..

[HACKERS] Re: Final call for platform testing

2001-04-04 Thread Pete Forman
Solaris 2.7-8 Sparc7.1 2001-03-22, Marc Fournier I've reported Solaris 2.6 Sparc as working on a post-RC1 snapshot. -- Pete Forman -./\.- Disclaimer: This post is originated WesternGeco -./\.- by myself and does not represent [EMAIL PROTECTED] -./\.-

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final call for platform testing

2001-04-04 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Nathan Myers wrote: On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:19:04PM +, Thomas Lockhart wrote: I saw three separate reports of successful builds on Linux 2.4.2 on x86 (including mine), but it isn't listed here. It is listed in the comments in the real docs. At least one

[HACKERS] Re: Final call for platform testing

2001-04-04 Thread Thomas Lockhart
You could ask. Just to ignore reports that you have asked for is not polite. My report was based on a virgin, unpatched 2.4.2 kernel, and (as noted) the Debian-packaged glibc-2.2.2. The simple fact is that the vast majority of Linux boxes are not yet running 2.4 kernels, so imho it is not a

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final call for platform testing

2001-04-04 Thread Martín Marqués
On Wednesday 04 April 2001 13:29, Pete Forman wrote: Solaris 2.7-8 Sparc7.1 2001-03-22, Marc Fournier I've reported Solaris 2.6 Sparc as working on a post-RC1 snapshot. Same for Solaris 8 Sparc, but only tested with RC1. -- El mejor sistema operativo es aquel que te da de comer. Cuida

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final call for platform testing

2001-04-03 Thread Nathan Myers
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:19:04PM +, Thomas Lockhart wrote: I saw three separate reports of successful builds on Linux 2.4.2 on x86 (including mine), but it isn't listed here. It is listed in the comments in the real docs. At least one report was for an extensively patched 2.4.2, and