On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> On 02.10.2012 21:20, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>>
>>> but its not high on my radar
>>>
>>> right now unless you can explain why it should be higher.
>>
>>
>> It may not be high, but I'm
On 02.10.2012 21:20, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
but its not high on my radar
right now unless you can explain why it should be higher.
It may not be high, but I'm just worried that we are likely to forget to
apply that change into HEAD if we postpone
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:03:27PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> (2) WAL files which were restored from the archive
>>>
>>> In 9.1 or before, the restored WAL files don't remain after failo
