Re: [HACKERS] Re: Small bug in pg_dump

2001-03-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
This does make me wonder (again) about some kind of pg_dump regression test. ISTM that a test should be doable by building a DB from data files, dumping it, restoring it, then using COPY to extract the data back to files (and probably doing a sort on the output). We could also store a BLOB or

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Small bug in pg_dump

2001-03-18 Thread Philip Warner
At 19:10 14/03/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: It might even make sense for an ArchiveEntry to store both forms of the name, and then using code could just select the form wanted instead of calling fmtId repeatedly. Not sure. BTW, making the -t switch compare to the unquoted name would probably also

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Small bug in pg_dump

2001-03-14 Thread Tom Lane
Philip Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Fixed done... Only part of the way there: pg_dump is still pretty seriously broken for mixed-case table names. Observe: regression=# create table "Foo" (z int); CREATE regression=# \q $ pg_dump -a -t '"Foo"' regression -- -- Selected TOC Entries: -- --

[HACKERS] Re: Small bug in pg_dump

2001-03-13 Thread Philip Warner
At 18:41 12/03/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: UPDATE pg_class SET reltriggers = (SELECT count(*) FROM pg_trigger where pg_class.oid = tgrelid) WHERE relname = 'Table'; Fixed done... Philip Warner|