Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ...
specifically, Peter, can you check that I've built/included the
right documentation?
Try reading the list of supported platforms at
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The INSTALL file looks quite bad.
It's clearly been freshly generated. The formatting does seem worse
than in previous versions, but it's not so bad I'd want to hold up
the release to fix it.
My guess is that the wrong version of lynx is being used to
I wrote:
My guess is that the wrong version of lynx is being used to build it.
I remember being dissatisfied with the output of developer.pg.org's
version of lynx back when we were making this file manually.
(The version I have here is 2.8.5rel.1 (04 Feb 2004) and it seems to
do fine.)
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The INSTALL file looks quite bad.
It's clearly been freshly generated. The formatting does seem worse
than in previous versions, but it's not so bad I'd want to hold up
the release to fix it.
My guess is that the
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Removing README.CVS from the tarball is something Marc handles, as
far as I know. I just added it to CVS and never worked on having it
removed from the tarballs.
I've added a rule to remove README.CVS when making a distribution. But
I seem to be missing any rules to
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ...
specifically, Peter, can you check that I've built/included the right
documentation?
Try reading the list of supported platforms at the bottom of the INSTALL
file...
---(end of
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Removing README.CVS from the tarball is something Marc handles, as
far as I know. I just added it to CVS and never worked on having it
removed from the tarballs.
I've added a rule to remove README.CVS when making a distribution.
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ...
specifically, Peter, can you check that I've built/included the right
documentation?
Try reading the list of supported platforms at the bottom of the INSTALL
file...
k,
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ...
README.CVS is not supposed to appear in the tarball --- whatever Bruce
thought he did to remove it is not working ...
regards, tom lane
---(end
Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ...
README.CVS is not supposed to appear in the tarball --- whatever Bruce
thought he did to remove it is not working ...
Removing README.CVS from the tarball is something Marc
Next Monday, we're going to put out a 7.4.3 release, incorporating all the
little patches that have been back-patched to date ... I just setup a cron
job that will build a nightly snapshot of 'stable', that is available on
the ftp server under /pub/stable_snapshot ...
If anyone has any patches
11 matches
Mail list logo