Re: [HACKERS] Replication timeout units

2012-08-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:34:25AM -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote: Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: from postgresql.conf.sample: #replication_timeout = 60s # in milliseconds; 0 disables Seconds or milliseconds? I would suggest

Re: [HACKERS] Replication timeout units

2011-12-22 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes: from postgresql.conf.sample: #replication_timeout = 60s# in milliseconds; 0 disables Seconds or milliseconds? I would suggest we just remove the in milliseconds, and instead say timeout for replication connections; 0 disables. That would take

Re: [HACKERS] Replication timeout units

2011-12-20 Thread Kevin Grittner
Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: from postgresql.conf.sample: #replication_timeout = 60s # in milliseconds; 0 disables Seconds or milliseconds? I would suggest we just remove the in milliseconds, and instead say timeout for

[HACKERS] Replication timeout units

2011-12-20 Thread Magnus Hagander
from postgresql.conf.sample: #replication_timeout = 60s # in milliseconds; 0 disables Seconds or milliseconds? I would suggest we just remove the in milliseconds, and instead say timeout for replication connections; 0 disables. --  Magnus Hagander  Me: http://www.hagander.net/  Work:

Re: [HACKERS] Replication timeout units

2011-12-20 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On 20 December 2011 13:38, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: from postgresql.conf.sample: #replication_timeout = 60s      # in milliseconds; 0 disables Seconds or milliseconds? I would suggest we just remove the in milliseconds, and instead say timeout for replication connections; 0