Re: [HACKERS] Restrictions of logical replication

2017-06-16 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 6/16/17 10:59, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> Docs stated "Publications can choose to limit the changes they produce to >> any combination of INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE". It is clear that only those >> DMLs are supported. > > What about COPY? Sure, added note about that as well. -- Peter Eisentraut

Re: [HACKERS] Restrictions of logical replication

2017-06-16 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
>> Some of that information was sprinkled around, but I have now added a >> new section that collects them all in one place. (section 31.4) > > > Shouldn't we mention that COPY is supported? I think any commands that are not mentioned in the section are considered to be supported. Best

Re: [HACKERS] Restrictions of logical replication

2017-06-16 Thread Euler Taveira
2017-06-16 11:03 GMT-03:00 Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com>: > > > Some of that information was sprinkled around, but I have now added a > new section that collects them all in one place. (section 31.4) Shouldn't we mention that COPY is supported? -- Euler Taveira

Re: [HACKERS] Restrictions of logical replication

2017-06-16 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> Docs stated "Publications can choose to limit the changes they produce to > any combination of INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE". It is clear that only those > DMLs are supported. What about COPY? > However, we should mention that large objects are not > supported. Right. Best regards, -- Tatsuo

Re: [HACKERS] Restrictions of logical replication

2017-06-16 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> On 6/16/17 03:00, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> Maybe I am missing something, but I could not find any description >> that logical replication does not support large objects and TRUNCATE >> in the doc. Do we want to add them to the doc as the restrictions of >> the logical replication? > > Some of

Re: [HACKERS] Restrictions of logical replication

2017-06-16 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 6/16/17 03:00, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > Maybe I am missing something, but I could not find any description > that logical replication does not support large objects and TRUNCATE > in the doc. Do we want to add them to the doc as the restrictions of > the logical replication? Some of that

Re: [HACKERS] Restrictions of logical replication

2017-06-16 Thread Euler Taveira
2017-06-16 4:00 GMT-03:00 Tatsuo Ishii : > Maybe I am missing something, but I could not find any description > that logical replication does not support large objects and TRUNCATE > in the doc. Do we want to add them to the doc as the restrictions of > the logical

Re: [HACKERS] Restrictions of logical replication

2017-06-16 Thread Aleksander Alekseev
Hi Tatsuo, On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 04:00:56PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > Maybe I am missing something, but I could not find any description > that logical replication does not support large objects and TRUNCATE > in the doc. Do we want to add them to the doc as the restrictions of > the

[HACKERS] Restrictions of logical replication

2017-06-16 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
Maybe I am missing something, but I could not find any description that logical replication does not support large objects and TRUNCATE in the doc. Do we want to add them to the doc as the restrictions of the logical replication? Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: