Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV on cvs tip/7.3.2

2003-05-29 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There's been some past speculation about putting in a function call nesting depth limit, but I haven't been able to think of any reasonable way to estimate a safe limit. GUC variable? Hmm...but that would mean that a normal user could still

Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV on cvs tip/7.3.2

2003-05-27 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
There's been some past speculation about putting in a function call nesting depth limit, but I haven't been able to think of any reasonable way to estimate a safe limit. The stack size limit varies a lot across different platforms, and the amount of stack space consumed per PL function call