Re: [HACKERS] Schema boggle...

2003-11-05 Thread Greg Stark
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, the use of schema's was my idea, to speed up some dreadfully > slow queries dealing with traffic stats from a table that was growing > painfully monolithic ... the idea is/was that it would be easier to > backup/remove all data pertaining

Re: [HACKERS] Schema boggle...

2003-11-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Actually, the use of schema's was my idea, to speed up some dreadfully slow queries dealing with traffic stats from a table that was growing painfully monolithic ... the idea is/was that it would be easier to backup/remove all data pertaining to a specific client if they decided to close their acc

Re: [HACKERS] Schema boggle...

2003-11-05 Thread Tom Lane
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> How else would you expect it to work? > List of relations > Schema | Name | Type | Owner > --+---+--+--- > public | categories| table| 18

Re: [HACKERS] Schema boggle...

2003-11-05 Thread Josh Berkus
Chris, > I work with Marc Fournier, for those who don't know, and have been > working extensively with the schemas feature for Hub.Org's new Account > Management package. Each client's data is stored in a seperate schema > set asside just for them (though they will never have direct access to > i

Re: [HACKERS] Schema boggle...

2003-11-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Chris Bowlby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > As you can see this is a nice, clean way to break down some datasets. > > But, if I do: > > > set search_path to public, test_001, test_002; > > > I only get access to the tables in test_001 and public, the tab

Re: [HACKERS] Schema boggle...

2003-11-05 Thread Tom Lane
Chris Bowlby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As you can see this is a nice, clean way to break down some datasets. > But, if I do: > set search_path to public, test_001, test_002; > I only get access to the tables in test_001 and public, the tables in > test_002 are not listed, and thus I do not

Re: [HACKERS] Schema boggle...

2003-11-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Jan Wieck wrote: > Chris Bowlby wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I work with Marc Fournier, for those who don't know, and have been > > working extensively with the schemas feature for Hub.Org's new Account > > Management package. Each client's data is stored in a seperate schem

Re: [HACKERS] Schema boggle...

2003-11-05 Thread Jan Wieck
Chris Bowlby wrote: Hi All, I work with Marc Fournier, for those who don't know, and have been working extensively with the schemas feature for Hub.Org's new Account Management package. Each client's data is stored in a seperate schema set asside just for them (though they will never have direc

[HACKERS] Schema boggle...

2003-11-05 Thread Chris Bowlby
Hi All, I work with Marc Fournier, for those who don't know, and have been working extensively with the schemas feature for Hub.Org's new Account Management package. Each client's data is stored in a seperate schema set asside just for them (though they will never have direct access to it, it he