Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have cleaned up the contrib install/uninstall to be more consistent,
> > used CREATE OR REPLACE function consisently, and removed transaction
> > blocks.
>
> ... and broken the buildfarm ...
OK, fixed, thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have cleaned up the contrib install/uninstall to be more consistent,
> used CREATE OR REPLACE function consisently, and removed transaction
> blocks.
... and broken the buildfarm ...
regards, tom lane
-
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On 11/10/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> OK, first question. How would someone have the 8.0 signatures in 8.2?
> > >> Don't they reinstall pgcrypto for every major release?
> >
> > > Why
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> If you don't re-run a contrib module's sql script then you don't get any
> >> new functions that may have been added to the module. So I think the
> >> real issue here is that we ought to deprecate the idea of ski
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you don't re-run a contrib module's sql script then you don't get any
>> new functions that may have been added to the module. So I think the
>> real issue here is that we ought to deprecate the idea of skipping that
>> step, period
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 11/10/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> OK, first question. How would someone have the 8.0 signatures in 8.2?
> >> Don't they reinstall pgcrypto for every major release?
>
> > Why reinstall if the functions come fr
Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 11/10/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK, first question. How would someone have the 8.0 signatures in 8.2?
> > Don't they reinstall pgcrypto for every major release?
>
> Why reinstall if the functions come from dump?
>
> At least in skype we stumbled on
"Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 11/10/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK, first question. How would someone have the 8.0 signatures in 8.2?
>> Don't they reinstall pgcrypto for every major release?
> Why reinstall if the functions come from dump?
> At least in skyp
On 11/10/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, first question. How would someone have the 8.0 signatures in 8.2?
> Don't they reinstall pgcrypto for every major release?
Why reinstall if the functions come from dump?
At least in skype we stumbled on the problem. But if the reinstal
Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 11/7/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK, should we add a mention in the 8.2.6 release notes or put it in the
> > 8. notes and figure if someone is upgrading they will read the 8.2
> > notes? What would the description be?
>
> """
> Note about pgcrypto - th
On 11/7/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, should we add a mention in the 8.2.6 release notes or put it in the
> 8. notes and figure if someone is upgrading they will read the 8.2
> notes? What would the description be?
"""
Note about pgcrypto - the functions were made STRICT in 8
Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 11/6/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > > Tom, how about putting a note about that into next 8.2 minor
> > > > > release notes? (8.3 too?) Something like "You need to refresh
> > > > > pgcrypto functions, because since rel 8.2 th
On 11/6/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > Tom, how about putting a note about that into next 8.2 minor
> > > > release notes? (8.3 too?) Something like "You need to refresh
> > > > pgcrypto functions, because since rel 8.2 the code depends
> > > > on fun
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > If something is not going a work (or is going a work in a different
> > > > way) in some version after loading a shot form a previous one I think
> > > > it should be documented or some kind of backwards compatibility
> > > > mechanism should be provided.
> > >
> > >
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marko Kreen wrote:
> > On 8/24/07, Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If something is not going a work (or is going a work in a different
> > > way) in some version after loading a shot form a previous one I think
> > > it should be documented or some kind of b
Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 8/24/07, Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >>> In 8.0 the pgcrypto functions were non-strict and checked for NULLs.
> > >>
On 8/24/07, Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> In 8.0 the pgcrypto functions were non-strict and checked for NULLs.
> >>> In 8.1 they were made STRICT.
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> In 8.0 the pgcrypto functions were non-strict and checked for NULLs.
>>> In 8.1 they were made STRICT.
>>> In 8.2 the NULL check were removed from code.
>
>> Not an s
Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> In 8.0 the pgcrypto functions were non-strict and checked for NULLs.
>> In 8.1 they were made STRICT.
>> In 8.2 the NULL check were removed from code.
> Not an smart move IMHO, I didn't create the function,
"Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8/24/07, Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I have a simple query that uses digest(data, 'sha1') and consistently
>> > crashes the backend
>>
>> The problem is with null arguments:
>>
>> cien
Manuel Sugawara wrote:
I have a simple query that uses digest(data, 'sha1') and consistently
crashes the backend
The problem is with null arguments:
ciencias=# select digest(null, 'sha1');
el servidor ha cerrado la conexión inesperadamente,
Can you check if the function is defined "STRICT"?
On 8/24/07, Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have a simple query that uses digest(data, 'sha1') and consistently
> > crashes the backend
>
> The problem is with null arguments:
>
> ciencias=# select digest(null, 'sha1');
In 8.0 the pgcr
Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have a simple query that uses digest(data, 'sha1') and consistently
> crashes the backend
The problem is with null arguments:
ciencias=# select digest(null, 'sha1');
el servidor ha cerrado la conexión inesperadamente,
probablemente
Hi,
I have a simple query that uses digest(data, 'sha1') and consistently
crashes the backend (tested in two different machines):
ciencias=# select version();
version
-
24 matches
Mail list logo
